21/10/2024Employment Rights Bill – What Does It Mean For Employers?
The much-anticipated Employment Rights Bill was published on 10 October. Described by the Government as… Read more
11/01/2017
Dewhurst v CitySprint UK Ltd (Case No: 2202512/2016)
Friday 6th January 2017 saw the latest successful judgment in a series of challenges by those working in the so-called “gig economy” in relation to their employment status.
Background
Following the Uber judgment (a summary of which can be found here), the case brought by Margaret Dewhurst against CitySprint UK Ltd (CitySprint) considered whether Ms Dewhurst was employed as a ‘worker’ rather than a “self-employed contractor” for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (Act), as asserted by her contract with CitySprint (entitled ‘Confirmation of Tender to Supply Courier Services to CitySprint (UK) Ltd‘ (Contract)). As outlined in our summary of the Uber case, ‘workers’ are not entitled to the full array of rights which employees receive, however worker status does entitle individuals to certain rights, such as minimum wage and holiday pay which are not applicable to the genuinely self-employed.
Facts
CitySprint is one of Britain’s largest courier companies, with around 3,200 couriers in Britain. Ms Dewhurst made deliveries for CitySprint for around two years’, including the delivery of clinical notes, blood and prescriptions to London hospitals. She typically worked for four days per week, from 9.30am to 6.30pm. Ms Dewhurst’s claim, which was supported by the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB), was brought in relation to two days’ of outstanding holiday pay, however the key issue considered by the London Central Employment Tribunal (Tribunal) was Ms Dewhurst’s legal status.
Decision
Ms Dewhurst was successful in her case before the Tribunal, where Employment judge Joanna Wade considered CitySprint’s control as a determining factor in the outcome. It was held that, whilst Ms Dewhurst was logged onto CitySprint’s tracking system, she would be deemed a ‘worker’ under S.230(3)(b) of the Act.
Similar to the stance taken in the Uber decision, Tribunal judge Wade wrote that:
“It is CitySprint which has the power to regulate the amount of work available, and it keeps its couriers busy by limiting the size of the fleet.”
Some of the factors pointing towards Ms Dewhurst’s ‘worker’ status included:
“…the contract is very specific about how the services are to be provided by the approved and trained couriers and permission must be obtained for arrangements to change. It would be a breach of contract for CitySprint to allow Ms Dewhurst to substitute.”
Employment judge Wade wrote: “any concept of her operating a business is a sham“. She summarised that, despite what her Contract said, Ms Dewhurst was:
Comment
In response to the outcome, a spokesperson for CitySprint stated:
“This case has demonstrated that there is still widespread confusion regarding this area of law, which is why we are calling on the government to provide better support and help for businesses across the UK who could be similarly affected.”
This case is typically fact-specific and is not a binding precedent, being only a first-instance decision. This area of law is likely to continue to be of key interest, with similar challenges against three further courier companies (Addison Lee, Excel and E-Courier) due to be heard in March/April 2017.
The Government appears to have acknowledged the need for clarification in relation to such issues. On 26 October 2016 the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee launched an inquiry into the ‘Future world of work and rights of workers’ which will consider, amongst other things, the status of those working in the ‘gig economy’. Submissions were requested to be made by 19 December 2016, with evidence sessions due to commence in early 2017.
The ‘Independent Review of Employment Practices in the Modern Economy’ led by Matthew Taylor (Chief Executive of the Royal Society of the Arts) also commenced on 30 November 2016. This is to consider the need for employment practices to evolve in order to meet the requirements of modern business models, including those using digital platforms like Uber and Deliveroo. The outcome of this review is expected in mid-2017.
Memery Crystal LLP is hosting a Breakfast Seminar on 26 January 2017, in which we will take a more detailed look at current cases focused on the gig economy and issues of status and how these will influence the development of employment law in 2017. For more information and to register for the event, please click here.
For any further information, please contact a member of our Employment team.
The much-anticipated Employment Rights Bill was published on 10 October. Described by the Government as… Read more
Memery Crystal has advised its long-standing client Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc on its entry into… Read more
The Labour Party’s manifesto, which was published on 13 June, confirms the intention to implement… Read more
91% of UK companies who participated in the 6 month 4-day week trial intend to… Read more