25/07/2024Memery Crystal advises Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc on £40.5 million disposal
Memery Crystal has advised its long-standing client Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc on its entry into… Read more
15/01/2016
Judges in the European Court of Human Rights have held that employers are permitted to read workers’ private messages sent via e-mail and private chat software during working hours.
The judgment, handed down on Tuesday, related to a case brought by an engineer in Romania, Mr Bogdan Barbulescu (“Mr B”), who claimed his employer had infringed his rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to respect for private and family life, the home and correspondence). Mr B’s employer had accessed his Yahoo Messenger account, believing it to be a work account holding professional contacts. The judges held that it was not unreasonable for an employer to want to verify that’s its employees were completing their professional tasks during working hours, and therefore the employer had not acted beyond its powers.
Facts
The employer had strictly forbidden its staff from using computers and other equipment for personal purposes. Mr B had created a Yahoo Messenger account for his work contacts, and his employer monitored the account for a week in 2007 to check he was completing his work, and whether he had breached company rules by sending personal messages during office hours. Mr Barbulescu claimed he had used the account to advise clients, however his employer found he had been sending private messages to his fiancée and brother, detailing his sexual health problems and other personal information. Mr B was fired for using company property for personal purposes, in breach of company rules.
The Court held that this was proportionate because the company believed it was accessing information relating to Mr B’s professional activities, it did not access other information stored on his work computer, and he had been given prior warning that the company could check his messages. Whilst Article 8 had been engaged, the Romanian courts had used the transcript of Mr B’s personal communications only to establish if Mr B had breached his employer’s internal rules. The Court concluded that the Romanian courts had fairly balanced Mr B’s Article 8 rights with the interests of his employer.
It is unclear whether it would have made a difference had Mr Barbulescu sent the messages from a personal device.
Implications for UK employers
UK law currently allows proportionate checks on employees’ communications. Employers should bear in mind the following points going forward:
Tim Ryan
Liz Kilburn
Memery Crystal has advised its long-standing client Intelligent Ultrasound Group plc on its entry into… Read more
The Labour Party’s manifesto, which was published on 13 June, confirms the intention to implement… Read more
On a wet Wednesday evening in May, Rishi Sunak (Sunak) announced a summer general election… Read more
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (‘DMCC Act’) was passed on 24th May… Read more